Securitized auto loans present a unique setting to measure the effects of ESG investing. I find that the ESG convenience yield almost quadrupled from 0.12% in 2017 to 0.46% in 2022. Consumers financing vehicles with loans from captive lenders benefit from the ESG convenience yield through lower borrowing costs. ESG mutual funds allocate more capital to securitizations from issuers with high ESG scores even if the securitizations finance high-emissions vehicles. The focus on ESG scores, rather than CO2, lowers the cost of capital for high-emissions vehicles. The findings suggest that green premia affect real quantities but do not raise the cost of CO2 emissions.

@techreport{kontz2023esg,
   title=,
   author={Kontz, Christian},
   type={Working Paper},
   institution={Stanford University},
   year={2023},
}

Invited Presentations: FIRS Conference 2024 (main program), OU-RFS Climate and Energy Conference 2024*, AFA Meeting 2025*, SITE New Research in Asset Pricing^†, GRASFI 2024 (main program), SoFiE Conference 2024 (main program), FMA Conference 2024* (main program), CEPR-ESSEC-Luxembourg Conference on Sustainable Financial Intermediation (main program), Harvard Climate Economics Workshop, UChicago, UC Santa Cruz, USC Marshall PhD Conference, NYU Shanghai/SoFiE Summer School, MFR/IMSI "Assessing the Economic and Environmental Consequences of Climate Change" Conference, Inter-Finance PhD Seminar, GEA Winter Meeting 2022
(*scheduled, ^†declined/scheduling conflict)

Awards: FIRS Conference 2024 Prize for PhD Students, GRASFI Conference 2024 Best PhD Paper Award, Myron S. Scholes PhD Prize 2024

This paper provides causal evidence that benchmarking-induced asset price distortions have real effects on corporate investment. We exploit exogenous variation in stocks' benchmarking intensity around Russell index reconstitutions to establish causality. We find that increased exposure to benchmark-linked capital flows causes stocks' CAPM β to rise. Firm managers perceive this as an increase in their cost of capital and reduce investment. Treated firms have 7.1% less physical and 8.4% less intangible capital after six years. At the aggregate level, the asset price distortions caused by benchmarking can explain 10.7% lower capital accumulation from 2000 to 2016. Our findings highlight how benchmark-linked investing affects capital allocation in the real economy.

@techreport{hansonkontz2024,
   title=,
   author={Hanson, Sebastian and Kontz, Christian},
   type={Working Paper},
   institution={Stanford University},
   year={2024},
}

Presentations: AFA Meeting 2025*, GEA Winter Meeting 2024*, Macro Finance Research Program (MFR) 2024 Summer Session for Young Scholars, Inter-Finance PhD Seminar
(* scheduled)

This paper studies the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing on the real economy. Using within industry-year variation, I find that 1.) firms with high ESG ratings have low marginal revenue products of capital (MRPK), while, 2.) firms with high sales per tCO2 emission have high MRPKs. This implies that reallocating capital to firms with high ESG ratings lowers allocative efficiency while reallocating capital to greener firms increases it. Motivated by these facts, I estimate a dynamic investment model featuring convenience yields on ESG assets and a CO2 externality to explore the implications of ESG investing for capital misallocation and climate change mitigation.